Lawyer Matthias Klein
Reutlinger Straße 36 76228 Karlsruhe
Lawyer Matthias Klein
+49 721 15101010
+49 721 15101011
VAT identification number:
The legal job title "lawyer" was awarded to me in the Federal Republic of Germany.
The Rechtsanwaltskammer responsible for me is the Rechtsanwaltskammer Karlsruhe Reinhold-Frank-Str. 72 76133 Karlsruhe Fon: +49 721 25 34 0 Fax: +49 721 26 62 7 Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Web:] www.rak-karlsruhe.de
The professional regulations for the lawyers who are based in Germany are available at the Federal Bar Association.
Specialist lawyer designations:
In Germany, the right to be a specialist lawyer is granted by the responsible Bar Association in accordance with the FAO (Fachanwaltsordnung - FAO). The Rechtsanwaltskammer Karlsruhe, which is responsible for me, has allowed me to use the titles "Specialist Lawyer for Criminal Law", "Specialist Lawyer for Medical Law" and "Specialist Lawyer for Banking and Capital Market Law" on the basis of proven special theoretical knowledge and practical experience.
Arbitration body of the legal profession:
In the case of disputes between lawyers and their clients, the possibility of out-of-court settlement exists upon request. at the Rechtsanwaltskammer Karlsruhe, which is responsible for me (pursuant to § 73 (2) no. 3 in conjunction with § 73 (5) BRAO) or at the conciliation office of the Rechtsanwaltschaft. This arbitration board mediates and arbitrates disputes between lawyer and client. My clients also have the opportunity to participate in such a dispute resolution procedure. The competent arbitration body for property disputes arising from the mandate relationship is the conciliation office of the legal profession, Neue Grünstr. 17, 10179 Berlin, www.s-d-r.org.
Professional liability insurance:
I maintain a professional indemnity insurance (property damage liability insurance) with Allianz Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft in 10900 Berlin. The territorial scope of the insurance cover includes activities in the member states of the European Union and thus meets the minimum requirements of § 51 Federal Lawyers Act (BRAO).
Conciliation bodies for consumers (EU):
Since 09.01.2016 the so-called ODR regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 524/2013) applies. It regulates the establishment of a European online dispute resolution platform (OS platform) for the out-of-court settlement of consumer and business disputes in online purchases and online service contracts. [Nbsp] The EU's online dispute resolution platform can be reached here: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/ The entrepreneur's e-mail address is: email@example.com I would like to point out that I am involved in a dispute settlement procedure Consumer arbitration board does NOT participate. The so-called ADR Directive has been transposed into national law by the Law Implementing the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Consumer Affairs and the Regulation on Consumer Dispute Resolution on 19 February 2016 (Federal Law Gazette I 254) This new regulation establishes a nationwide framework for settling disputes arising from online and offline contracts between consumers and businesses by bringing them before an extrajudicial consumer dispute resolution body. The main focus is the Consumer Tribunal Law (VSBG). In addition, various special statutory provisions on arbitration bodies will be adjusted. [Nbsp] According to § 36 (1) VSGB, I inform you that there is no obligation for lawyers to participate in dispute settlement proceedings. [Nbsp] I point out that I am DO NOT participate in a dispute settlement procedure before a consumer dispute resolution body. According to § 37 Abs. 1 VSBG I point out to you for me as a lawyer responsible consumer arbitration, which can be called, if a dispute over a consumer contract by the entrepreneur (lawyer) and the consumer (client) could not be settled. The competent consumer arbitration board for property disputes arising from the mandate relationship is the conciliation office of the legal profession, Neue Grünstr. 17, 10179 Berlin, www.s-d-r.org. An obligation of lawyers to participate in a dispute resolution procedure does not exist. I point out that I am involved in a dispute resolution